List of Articles حق تقدم

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - A Comparative Study of Mortgage Contract and Its Establishment in Iranian and American Legal Systems
  Farideh  Shokri
  Abstract: According to Iranian legal system, despite the existence of fixed debt in an obligation, pledgee and its waiver, the mortgage contract shall be enforceable and the right of pledgee shall be established on the mortgaged object. This is done without any differen More

  Abstract: According to Iranian legal system, despite the existence of fixed debt in an obligation, pledgee and its waiver, the mortgage contract shall be enforceable and the right of pledgee shall be established on the mortgaged object. This is done without any difference between the two stages of creation and establishment of the right of pledge. Even in the case of immovable mortgage it is obligatory to register the document. On the other hand, in Iranian legal system the principle of transferability of the mortgage – however briefly – has been officially recognized so that conclusion of a mortgage contract and the establishment of the right of pledgee is no obstacle to future transfer of mortgage or pertinent rights by the mortgagor in case it does not violate the rights of the pledgee. The rule of this principle, without special stipulations on establishment of the rights mentioned in the contract such as obligation to register the mortgage, will sometimes raise consequences such as dispute in discerning priority, reference to the superficial contracts containing the date of priority and consequently violating the rights of pledgee as well as legal dispute in courts and probably penal procedures. Whereas in many legal systems across the world, the US legal system for instance, there is a distinction between the two stages of concluding the mortgage contract or a pledge and stipulations for the establishment of the rights of mortgage for either side. In these legal systems, a distinction has been made between movable and immovable mortgage and establishment of the right of pledgee on each case requires finishing certain formalities otherwise, the right of the pledgee will be incomplete and the priority will be with the other party finishing the procedure. The question raised in this paper is this: Is it possible to make a distinction between the two stages in Iranian legal system with respect to the existing jurisprudential laws and the enforceable legal texts? Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Priority in Subscription of New Shares in Joint Stock Companies in Iranian and American Legal Codes
  Abduolreza  Asadi Aqboaghi
  Abstract: The priority in subscription of new shares is the same as priority given to the previous shareholders that is under certain legal procedures and nature. The source of priority in Iranian law is law and articles of association in American law. In both legal sys More

  Abstract: The priority in subscription of new shares is the same as priority given to the previous shareholders that is under certain legal procedures and nature. The source of priority in Iranian law is law and articles of association in American law. In both legal systems, priority is a transactable right. The transfer of this right is carried out in the stock market or outside the market and based on restrictions the shareholders face in transfer of their shares. Like movable properties, priority can be attached by the third party and it can be sold on tender without formalities and immediately after the approval of the court. In Iranian law, priority is a peremptory norm and a non-abrogatable right of the former business partners. According to the articles of association, their rights cannot be denied although denying their priority is within the discretion and authority of extraordinary general assembly, which should be well-justified and non-forceable. The procedures must be brought in the reports of the board of directors and the official inspectors for proper decision making. In the United States of America’s law, however, the priority is a complementary principle and the shareholders will enjoy priority in case it has already been mentioned in the articles of association of the bank or financial institutions, otherwise, they will have no priority in subscription for new shares or for capital increase unless the articles of association is amended. Manuscript profile