%0 Journal Article %T A Comparison of Mortgage Contract and Transaction with Right of Restitution through an Approach based on Existing Precedent %J Jurisprudence and Private Law %I Shahid Motahari University %Z 2645-355X %A Gholamali Sedghi %D 1399 %\ 1399/06/05 %V 1 %N 3 %P 107-124 %! A Comparison of Mortgage Contract and Transaction with Right of Restitution through an Approach based on Existing Precedent %K transaction with right of restitution %K mortgage %K revocable sale %K debt %K corpus and interest ownership. %X Abstract: Transaction with right of restitution refers to any supplementary and commutative contract in which the assignor reserves the right for himself to reject consideration and restitute transferred property. In view of the law on registration of deeds and real estates, transaction with right of restitution is a combined contract of rendable property and mortgage. There are, however, differences between transaction with right of restitution and mortgage including this that the contract interests belongs to the transferee in the transaction with the right of restitution while corpus interests of the mortgaged property belong to the mortgagee. By virtue of Article 324 of the law on registration of deeds and real estates and the existing precedent, all the benefits belong to the purchaser and given religious rules and regulations, this stipulation is the same as the debt interest. However, if we ignore the right of the purchaser to collect interests, given the degree of inflation and devaluation of money, we have equally ignored commutative justice in his case. Therefore, belongingness of the interests to him seems to be possible via bartering and realization of relative balance. %U http://rimag.ir/fa/Article/16503